searching for an anorak

Comments (0)
David Ferrabee joins the ranks of those searching for a way to rigourously measure communication - at least I hope he wants to get real measures, as opposed to some of the easier to generate but essentially meaningless numbers that can get floated around. The major problem with comms measurement, and what makes it so difficult, is that the thing being measured is really fuzzy - typically impact, or behavioural or attitude change, and is easy to misreport and derive incorrect conclusions, especially when so few companies seem willing to adopt standard experimental techniques to isolate what has caused the effect. Contrast this with epidemiological population studies, or clinical drug trials, in which strenuous efforts are made to ensure that biases are eliminated, variables are unintwined and effects are associated with the correct causes. We could do worse than start from there. Technorati Tags: ,

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

Pinboard – a social bookmarking service
I started using Pinboard as my bookmarking service a while back, after the sad demise of magnol.ia (which luckily for…
RSS isn't dead.
Marshal Kirkpatrick over at RWW proclaims that Enterprise RSS has died. Taking a closer look at the post reveals some…
Social Networks as a retention mechanism
Thought this was very interesting. Shel Holtz being interviewed by Ron ShewchukQuestion #2: Which company do you think does internal…